Apodictic Law Meaning
For example, apodictic law forbids making false statements, but if you secretly hid a Jewish neighbor during World War II and were then confronted by a Nazi stormtrooper who asked you where Jews could hide, apodictic law would require you to reveal the truth. Or think of the case of Rahab, who, after receiving the Israelite spies, had the same choice to tell the truth or save the life (Joshua 2). Apodictic is a word for those who are convinced of what they are talking about. It is a practical word that can describe a coherent concept, a conclusive person, or even the concluding remarks of that conclusive person. A well-known close relative of apedology is the paradigm (“an exceptionally clear or typical example”); both words are based on the Greek deiknynai, which means “to show”. More distant relatives (from the Latin dicere, a parent of deiknynai, meaning “to say”) include diction, dictation, edictation, and prediction. “I can claim apodictic skills once I get my electrical engineering certification.” When God`s law is applied in various cases, we call it casuistry law (if a person does this and that, then it will be the punishment). Casuist law in Israel is often the development of laws for special personal and social needs in light of God`s holy and eternal apodictic law, which does not mean that casuist law should be rejected because of its abuse. In fact, God`s apodictic commandments must be elaborated in the challenges of our daily lives, and therefore some guidance must be offered, even if a person must form his own judgment and take responsibility for his own action as a last resort. The problem we all face is knowing what is good and then having the moral courage to do it.
Therefore, true love motivates a believer to fulfill the requirements of the law (Romans 13:10). It is the love of God that spreads abroad in the heart of the believer, which is the dynamic motivator of our behavior, and this love manifests itself in harmony with and not separately from the apodictic laws and commandments of Sacred Scripture. Theologians discuss two types of law: apodictic and casuisistic. Apodictic law consists of absolute commandments, often issued by a higher power, such as the Ten Commandments. Kauist law (also known as jurisprudence) is based on precedents and moral principles applied to determine right and wrong in certain situations. Some will say that since Jesus said that He did not come to abolish the law, it means that we are still below. This misses the point where the law is respected. Jesus did not come to abolish the law or the prophets because they are always vital to our understanding of God and our own spiritual heritage. It was the law and the prophets that paved the way for Christ`s coming and Atonement on the cross, and abolishing them would leave little meaning for Christ`s actions. But he also did not leave the old law and covenant standing, but brought the new covenant.
We even recognize this every time we talk about the Bible, because “testament” is a different word for “covenant.” Whenever we talk about the “New Testament,” we are talking about the New Covenant, which was initiated by Jesus. Although Christ condemned the casuistry of the scribes and Pharisees, who perverted the law through human speculation, he in no way trivialized the role of obedience specific to God`s commandments, but made specific obedience a test of the authenticity of the disciples` love (John 14:21). While obedience to God`s apodictic law can never be the basis for attaining His salvation (except through the supposed righteousness of Christ), Paul tells us that the law itself is holy, just, and good (Romans 7:12). Just as there are larger genres in all biblical literature, there are also different categories in the genre of “law.” The two categories into which all laws fall are casuistry and apodictic. Therefore, casuist law would argue that we should tell the truth to whom the truth is due. In both cases mentioned above, casuistry law can be seen as making the law more specific and eliminating confusion as to its application. We can argue that Rahab, who lived in the context of the war and shifted his loyalty from the king of Jericho to the god of Israel as his true king, had no obligation to give full disclosure to the soldiers. Their higher duty to protect the lives of God`s servants outweighed the general apodictic commandment to tell the truth, and their actions were acceptable to God. Latin apodicticus, from the Greek apodeiktikos, from apodeiknynai to demonstrate, from apo- + deiknynai to show more about the diction The apodictic law includes absolute general commandments given from above as “thou shalt not do it”, and as such has little application in the courts.
The Ten Commandments are an excellent example of apodictic law. The 10 commandments are examples of apodictic law: direct commandments without conditions or provisions, they are supposed to apply to all those who are under the Old Testament covenant between God and Israel. Unfortunately, as you might expect, casuistry law in Christian history has often been viewed negatively as excuses and exceptions where there should be none, and this has too often led to situational ethics. Situational ethics reduces the apodictic law of a system of legal rules to the “law of love alone,” in which the apodictic law is quickly treated as a “servant of love”; which became so popular when Debby Boone sang these words in the song You Light Up My Life decades ago – “it can`t be wrong if it sounds so right”. This word comes from the Latin “apodicticus”, originally from the Greek “apodeiktikos” and “apodeiktos”. It comes from the verbal adjective of “apodeiknynai”, which means “to show, to demonstrate, to show by argument, to show, to prove”. I hear theologians and some preachers talking about apodictic law and casuistry law.